Thanks for the tips. I am a bit suprised about what you told about the wave usage. If I look at the safeHtml code, it might not be mature enough and more suitable for hello-world applications. I get a bit flashbacks when writing this as many gwt code has been upgraded after iterations to be more suitable for enterprise app's. I remember that Wave made me very happy because it resulted in mature code
Anyway let me describe a very common situation out here where many gwt developers always struggle with: gwt connected to a backend cms to retrieve all texts. I assume that you know that most cms's allow you to write html text with online html editors. So your description and the SimpleSanitizer isn't very suitable for this situation as the business will kill me when the text appears escaped online. Of course the SimpleSanitizer is just simple like the name indicates, but maybe it should be moved to the test suite as I don't think it's very useful. I think it would be useful if there would exists a default santizer that will allow any html tag with only a class attribute as for most cms situations this is enough. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
