Yes, that is my workaround. :-) But it is a hack, we want to have a *proper* way to fix it.
On Sep 23, 4:05 am, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, September 23, 2011 12:38:36 AM UTC+2, Richard wrote: > > > Thanks for the reply. > > > I read the link but still do not get it. > > > Does "exclude attribute" exclude files match the pattern or exclude > > the file from the compile list? What I want is to tell gwtc to > > *ignore* XmlAdapter or Unmarshaller even they are referenced in the > > code. > > That won't work. > > But you can provide an "emulated" version that is a no-op. See “Overriding > one package implementation with another” > inhttp://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideOrganizingProjec... > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I could not find the examples you mentioned linked from the > > issue. > > > Thanks, > > Richard > > > On Sep 22, 12:19 pm, Thomas Broyer <t.br...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Seehttp:// > > code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideOrganizingProjec...(and > > > there was examples linked from the issue; AntLR.gwt.xml for instance) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
