I also agree, but I don't think google is responsable for improving the user framework on gwt. It is great that they put together uibinder, gwt-rpc, the editors framework and other goodies, but its your choice to use them or not.
I am personally happy with a strong gwt core, and that just keep getting better with each release. On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 8:32 PM, camerojo <jadcpub-goo...@yahoo.com.au>wrote: > I also agree - I hope the Google folk look at this. > > GWT is a wonderful concept, and we should all be very grateful for it, > but some of the implementation is certainly over engineered. > > In particular I wish that more focus was given to fixing basic bugs > (of which there are quite a few) rather than coming up with new high > level architectural concepts. > > Of course all developers would prefer to be playing around with new > concepts rather than fixing bugs in existing code, but production > software demands that basic debugging must always take priority. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- Guit: Elegant, beautiful, modular and *production ready* gwt applications. http://code.google.com/p/guit/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
