Thanks for clarification, Paul. BTW, do you know if there anywhere I could find documents on the serialization tricks like this.
The abstract class usage is a very common programming way for java. -----Original Message----- From: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Robinson Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:14 PM To: google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: GWT - DTO On 18/04/12 12:02, Roy Yeung wrote: > Take a look at this, > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7213 > > May be someone can try out and confirm. My comment came from my > previous experience in earlier version. That issue is specifically about how abstract classes are treated when they are not serializable, but a subclass is. Your post showed no abstract classes, so it doesn't appear to be the same thing to me. Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.