On Friday, June 8, 2012 2:14:27 PM UTC+2, zorro wrote: > > Why the aforementioned error message "The requested type is not > default-instantiable" does not include concrete type info? > It would speed up development. >
I agree (kind of), though in theory this should have been caught up by the ValidationTool at compile time (and really, it should: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/tags/2.4.0/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/apt/DomainChecker.java#239 ) In the mean time, set a breakpoint in ReflectiveServiceLayer and look at the value of the clazz argument: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/browse/tags/2.4.0/user/src/com/google/web/bindery/requestfactory/server/ReflectiveServiceLayer.java#84 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Gqn8l8xCufcJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
