I signed up for the trusted tester some 3 days back and yet to get it. Do you guys know how long it took for you to get it, if anybody got it.
You can call me noob but from what I understood from the IO video, Cloud endpoint seem to replace the request factory approach. You don't need to use any request factory anywhere for the cloud endpoint based approach. Correct me if I'm wrong. please let me know. Thanks much, Raj... On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Saturday, July 7, 2012 6:11:51 PM UTC+2, Nick Siderakis wrote: >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=v9TG7OzsZqQ&feature=player_** >> detailpage#t=910s<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9TG7OzsZqQ&feature=player_detailpage#t=910s> >> >> It looks like the new Cloud Endpoints implement a lot of >> the functionality that makes RequestFactory attractive. >> >> - Patch commits - only send what has changed to the server. >> - Batch requests - RequestBatcher >> - Partial GETs - similar to defining a proxy with a subset of >> attributes. >> >> It has the benefit of being a standard REST api, but is limited to App >> Engine Apps. >> >> What do you guys think? >> > > Looks really great! > I knew they'd been working hard for the past years to build a common > framework for all their APIs, in a truely RESTful way, with discoverability > (hopefully HATEOAS too, though I haven't checked), etc. (Joe Gregorio, who > worked on the Atom Publication Protocol some years ago, as Google adopted > it for the GData APIs, but before Joe joined Google, is part of this > ongoing effort AFAIK) ; what I didn't see coming was to allow external > developers to leverage that framework to build their own APIs! > It'd be too bad if it were limited to AppEngine and stayed closed source > though… > > Bob Vawter (who created RequestFactory along with Ray Ryan), created > Flatpack in his new job, which uses a very similar approach to Cloud > Endpoints, though leveraging JAX-RS on the server-side. > See https://plus.google.com/110742163942000381699/posts/BRyL2DFy6hk and > https://plus.google.com/110742163942000381699/posts/NxRfQjatF6g > Now is this really "what RF should have been", as he wrote it, I'm not > sure. But Flatpack doesn't (yet) has dirty-tracking. > > BTW, does Cloud Endpoint client-side APIs have dirty-tracking? or you have > to do it yourself and build "patch commits" by hand? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/xlw-9foMFuQJ. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
