On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:15:01 PM UTC+2, Clint Gilbert wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > (just like everyone else doing web dev out there, in JS, CoffeeScript, > Dart, etc.) > > TLDR: There are many of us out here, I suspect, for whom this is exactly > what we do not want. > > Elemental sounds cool, but I'm glad it's optional. I hope that stays > the case, and that the permuted-compile use case stays well-supported > for the foreseeable future. >
I see no reason it wouldn't be. AFAICT, Elemental is not meant to replace what already exists, it's a new, different way of doing similar things (and more!) for people who need it. It's "new" as in "new choice", not "new vs. old". As Ray said at I/O, it's best-suited for mobile apps where you need to cut every possible overhead, or for people who need to use bleeding-edge APIs without waiting for someone to hand-wrap them. https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions/gooio2012/218/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/XR7mV96P8B8J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
