On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Nukeador <[email protected]> wrote: > Checking bug comments, in particular Pascal's one, I think it's not > currently needed: > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763007#c3 > >> Firefox is already the default browser in Ubuntu and Canonical is >> following our rapid release process, I am therefore not sure who the target >> audience would be. On the other hand, I can see the extra work for Mozilla >> in putting Ubuntu download links (proper platform detection, design work for >> all of our download pages, localization work for the download button...).
Yes, Firefox is already the default on Ubuntu. Yes, changing the download pages would require work. And those two reasons may well be reasons enough not to bother. But I was asking about the additional reason about keeping the brand intact. What's that about? -- Henri Sivonen [email protected] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
