Dan, if you want to do some verification on your side, all the terms that originally came from your code have sourcesystem_cd=³PCORNET_CDM². I do wonder if something in the vitals ontology changed to get the hierarchy we wanted, so it is worth a look. Jeff Klann
On 9/8/14, 7:36 PM, "GPC Informatics" <d...@madmode.com> wrote: >#109: represent PCORI CDM terminology as i2b2 metadata >--------------------------+----------------------------------- > Reporter: rwaitman | Owner: dconnolly > Type: enhancement | Status: accepted > Priority: major | Milestone: initial-data-domains >Component: data-sharing | Resolution: > Keywords: | Blocked By: 89 > Blocking: 145, 146 | >--------------------------+----------------------------------- > >Comment (by dconnolly): > > Russ forwarded me an update from Jeff Klann Monday, September 08, 2014 > 2:49 PM. I haven't managed to take a close look, though he says: > > > It is based on Dan¹s code to generate the core ontology, and I¹ve been > careful not to change the paths (C_FULLNAME). So any transform that uses > the path names will work at SCILHS also. > >-- >Ticket URL: ><http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/109#comment:18> >gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> >Greater Plains Network - Informatics The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
