#478: ADAPTABLE monitoring --------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: schandaka | Owner: schandaka Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: adaptable-monitor Component: data-sharing | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: 274, 476, 496 Blocking: | --------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by mwennberg): I ran the ADAPTABLE query at KUMC and found that no patients had encounters after the date of trial enrollment. We realized that this was due to our encounters being date shifted in the CDM whereas our PCORNET_TRIAL table had the actual date that the patient was enrolled. I followed up with Laura Qualls who confirmed that we should date shift the trial enrollment date just like we do all of our other dates in the CDM. Laura Qualls' response on 4/26/2017 was {{{ Yes, date shifting must be applied consistently for all CDM dates for the same patient. }}} I also raised a question regarding the level of PHI disclosure. Their preliminary work-plan had that we were disclosing PHI, which I was surprised by. Her response was: {{{ We went with “PHI” to be conservative, but after consulting with our IRB expert have determined that it is a Limited Data Set. It can’t be considered de- identified because of the inclusion of the TRIAL_PARTICIPANT_ID. We have updated the Work Plan accordingly. }}} -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/478#comment:32> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev