Hello Hugh, Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 8:58:50 AM, you wrote:
DHN> This is an important point. DHN> HIC were obsessed with getting GP's to do something that would save the DHN> HIC money - so much so that our clinic got set up with individual PKI DHN> keys and usb dongles and the HIC staffperson didn't think it was DHN> necessary to arrange for a Location Certificate. DHN> Of course, a location certificate is the one to use if you are sending DHN> clinical information securely. There is no real difference other than the fact that the private key is locked into a (Mostly) secure container and never leaves the usb key so is very hard to steal. The encryption is exactly the same with Site certificates and Individual Keys. The variation is in the security of the private key. The HIC use Location certificates so I doubt their motive was sinister. They just underestimate the ability of the (above) average person to make use of a technology that is in its infancy and is not readily useable without software specifically designed to take advantage of it, while shielding the user from the complexity. DHN> If the HIC had worked from the start to enable better clinical DHN> communications, then we would all be on board by now. I think the V1 of the PKI API, which didn't really work was a nail in the coffin. V2 actually works pretty reliably, apart from some driver installation issues. The current version is able to do what is needed. Self generation of Keys is something they should embrace, at least on request, however for many users it would raise the barrier further. Personally I think every new provider number should come with a HESA key. If you are authenticated to see patients them you should be authenticated enough to have a HESA key! DHN> Andrew Patterson wrote: >>I guess the question is, is any form of PKI certificate >>that carries with it some real legal responsibility for its >>use acceptable to GP's at the current moment?? Or >>is that something for the future.. should we be setting >>our sights on just deploying some simple, no legal >>hassle secure email infrastructure?? >> >> DHN> _______________________________________________ DHN> Gpcg_talk mailing list DHN> [email protected] DHN> http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk -- Best regards, Andrew mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew McIntyre Buderim Gastroenterology Centre www.buderimgastro.com.au PH: 07 54455055 FAX: 54455047 _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
