If it is a remote cluster mount from your clients (hopefully!), you might want 
to look at priority to order mounting of the file-systems. I don’t know what 
would happen if the overmounted file-system went away, you would likely want to 
test.

Simon

From: <gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org> on behalf of 
"marc.cau...@psi.ch" <marc.cau...@psi.ch>
Reply to: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Date: Thursday, 19 November 2020 at 15:39
To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] Mounting filesystem on top of an existing filesystem


Hi,



I have a filesystem holding many projects (i.e., mounted under /projects), each 
project is managed with filesets.

I have a new big project which should be placed on a separate filesystem 
(blocksize, replication policy, etc. will be different, and subprojects of it 
will be managed with filesets). Ideally, this filesystem should be mounted in 
/projects/newproject.



Technically, mounting a filesystem on top of an existing filesystem should be 
possible, but, is this discouraged for any reason? How GPFS would behave with 
that and is there a technical reason for avoiding this setup?

Another alternative would be independent mount point + symlink, but I really 
would prefer to avoid symlinks.



Thanks a lot,

Marc
_________________________________________________________
Paul Scherrer Institut
High Performance Computing & Emerging Technologies
Marc Caubet Serrabou
Building/Room: OHSA/014
Forschungsstrasse, 111
5232 Villigen PSI
Switzerland

Telephone: +41 56 310 46 67
E-Mail: marc.cau...@psi.ch
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to