> On Nov 19, 2020, at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Buzzard 
> <jonathan.buzz...@strath.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> On 19/11/2020 15:34, Caubet Serrabou Marc (PSI) wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have a filesystem holding many projects (i.e., mounted under /projects), 
>> each project is managed with filesets.
>> I have a new big project which should be placed on a separate filesystem 
>> (blocksize, replication policy, etc. will be different, and subprojects of 
>> it will be managed with filesets). Ideally, this filesystem should be 
>> mounted in /projects/newproject.
>> Technically, mounting a filesystem on top of an existing filesystem should 
>> be possible, but, is this discouraged for any reason? How GPFS would behave 
>> with that and is there a technical reason for avoiding this setup?
>> Another alternative would be independent mount point + symlink, but I really 
>> would prefer to avoid symlinks.
> 
> This has all the hallmarks of either a Windows admin or a newbie Linux/Unix 
> admin :-)
> 
> Simply put /projects is mounted on top of whatever file system is providing 
> the root file system in the first place LOL.
> 
> Linux/Unix and/or GPFS does not give a monkeys about mounting another file 
> system *ANYWHERE* in it period because there is no other way of doing it.

Some others have said, but I disagree. It wasn’t that long ago that GPFS acted 
really screwy with systemd because it did something in a way other than Linux 
expected. As it is now, their devices are not /dev/whatever or server:/wherever 
like just about every other filesystem type. Not unreasonable to believe it 
would “act funny” compared to other FS. 

I like GPFS a lot, but this is not one of my favorite characteristics of it.

--
#BlackLivesMatter
____
|| \\UTGERS,     |---------------------------*O*---------------------------
||_// the State  |         Ryan Novosielski - novos...@rutgers.edu
|| \\ University | Sr. Technologist - 973/972.0922 (2x0922) ~*~ RBHS Campus
||  \\    of NJ  | Office of Advanced Research Computing - MSB C630, Newark
     `'
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to