Andrew Long wrote the following on 1/26/11 1:23 PM: > The only problem I am currently reporting is the bad signature one.
In your in-line signed e-mail, your signature verifies: Good signature from Andrew Long <[email protected]> Key ID: 0x0CA654D6 / Signed on: 1/26/11 1:23 PM Key fingerprint: AFB0 C3C9 CD33 D648 51B4 7992 A31D EBC0 DB4F 74EA > I am also a bit confused about the situation; since i have upgraded, I am now > able to verify the signatures of mails that I have sent using openpgp/mime > since the update, and mails sent by Alex using openpgp/mime since slightly > before the upgrade (go figure). > However, mails received more than a few hours ago which I could not verify > before the update remain unverifiable. By "remain unverifiable", do you mean that the signature is bad? > > The other problem that I am (relatively) patiently waiting for is the problem > whereby encrypted multipart mails don't get re-parsed after decryption, in > order to present the correct mail image. What exactly do you get? I'm going to send you, OFF LIST, four test messages: - signed in-line - signed OpenPGPMIME - encrypted and signed - encrypted and signed OpenPGP/MIME Let's see what happens. Charly _______________________________________________ gpgtools-users mailing list [email protected] Changes: http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/listinfo/gpgtools-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/options/gpgtools-users/[email protected]?unsub=Unsubscribe&unsubconfirm=1 This email sent to: [email protected]
