Hi Charly, hi Chris, thank you for answers.
On 27.01.2011, at 17:42, Chris Owen wrote: > This is probably just a language/idiom thing but in American English at least > saying "Too bad" in this way could be construed as "Tough titty" or "Deal > with it". Probably not what you meant. Fixed. > Please note that the correct name of the "old unmaintained package" is > and has always been Gpg Tools. The author's web site no longer exists. > It seems that for all useful purposes, Gpg Tools does not exist any > longer, except in the memory of some old and unmaintained users. Updated. > Question: what is "older than 2.0.17"? e.g 2.0.16 is older and 2.1 is newer. It's described here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning > The current stable release *is* 2.0.17. Exactly. But 2.0.17 is not older than 2.0.17. > 3. I very much appreciate the work that GPGTools' Team is doing. Thank you. > It is possible that not all GnuPG users want or need *all* GPGTools' > packages, and I appreciate that GPGTools' Team gives users the > capability of installing packages of her/his choice. Also using the Installer the user can still chose which packages to install. I've added a new section. Best regards, Alex _______________________________________________ gpgtools-users mailing list [email protected] FAQ: http://www.gpgtools.org/faq.html Changes: http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/listinfo/gpgtools-users Unsubscribe: http://lists.gpgtools.org/mailman/options/gpgtools-users/[email protected]?unsub=Unsubscribe&unsubconfirm=1 This email sent to: [email protected]
