Miller, Shao wrote: > ...I would continue to enjoy contributions from Michael > directly to the main code-base until such a time as I lose that > respect/faith or the developers' consensus is to the contrary, or Marty > decides absolutely to the contrary...
A decision which might be based on a consensus that only he has access to determine is a consensus, since the information might flow privately. > ...I do also > have a high degree of faith in that anyone with such concerns could > discuss it with Marty privately. It's possible that their concerns > could even be reflected in his decisions as Project Leader, albeit > anonymously... I have to add that I would guess that yet more responsibilities that a project's leader might have might include providing some degree of opacity for certain details, for users, commercial consumers, and community-at-large. I can appreciate that balancing, Marty. :) In this case there was frank discussion in a fairly public forum, so I felt comfortable to share my thoughts, too. I apologize if I've offended anyone with subject matter they were not interested in. So about that DHCP request packet modification business... I'd like to ask community-wide, has anyone else come across the situation Steven Shiau describes, where their server gives gPXE one IP and the finally-booted OS another? It might be good to get a sense of how common it is, in order to prioritize work on it. - Shao Miller _______________________________________________ gPXE mailing list [email protected] http://etherboot.org/mailman/listinfo/gpxe
