Hi, On 9/19/06, Dan Connelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Repeating a posting I made recently on the Jackrabbit Dev's ocm thread. The decision point appears to be at hand.]
Sorry for not responding before.
Let me suggest that a *fresh* name for the "jcr mapping" component within Jackrabbit would help 1) create a bigger buzz, 2) bring in fresh contributors and 3) reduce confusion.
I don't see what's wrong with "JCR mapping". It's even in line with the existing Jackrabbit subprojects "JCR-RMI" and "JCR server". BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
