Sorry about that. I tried to reduce it to the maximum so that it could be possible to simulate this behavior. https://pastebin.com/cyCwAX0z
If I remove line 18, everything goes normally. This behavior does not occur on smaller networks (if reduce a number of nodes on graph, everything is ok). Note that cpu is not used at all. Regards, Ronaldo Alves Em ter., 30 de jun. de 2020 às 11:20, Tiago de Paula Peixoto <ti...@skewed.de> escreveu: > > Dear Ronaldo, > > When asking questions like this, it is imperative to include a minimal > working example that reproduces the problem. Otherwise there is not much > we can do to help. > > Best, > Tiago > > Am 30.06.20 um 16:07 schrieb Ronaldo Alves: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am conducting tests where I perform several parallel tests of the > > SIR model (they are not using n iterations because I need to find out > > when the model stabilizes, where si (t) = 0). > > Parallel execution has been carried out with the multiprocessing > > library. In larger networks (2000 nodes), when performing the > > procedure of removing parallel edges (the graphs are converted to > > undirected), the execution freeze. Can you imagine the reason for this > > behavior? If I don't execute the remove_parallel_edges function, > > everything happens normally ... > > Execution hangs when iterate_sync will be performed. A serial run > > works normally (without multiprocessing). > > > > Would anyone have a tip? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Ronaldo Alves > > _______________________________________________ > > graph-tool mailing list > > graph-tool@skewed.de > > https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool > > > > > -- > Tiago de Paula Peixoto <ti...@skewed.de> > > _______________________________________________ > graph-tool mailing list > graph-tool@skewed.de > https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool _______________________________________________ graph-tool mailing list graph-tool@skewed.de https://lists.skewed.de/mailman/listinfo/graph-tool
