Dylan Beaudette wrote:
I vote +1 (?) for moving to SVN as hosted by OSGeo.org. After spending some time with Trac on my own projects I have really come to like it. Furthermore, integration with the rest of OSGeo would be a good thing. Having the source code next to projects like GDAL, Mapserver, etc. might even entice some new developers into the GRASS community.
Dylan, I'll second the benefits of Trac coupled with Subversion! I was a bit of a sceptic a year ago, figure it would be just another bug system, and just another source control system but they have individually improved the GDAL project, and the integration between them has been the icing on the cake. For instance, the ease with which tickets (bugs) can refer to source control changesets and the "timeline" page showing commits, ticket updates (and wiki changes). All that aside, I think there are social and shared support benefits to a common infrastructure, and I'd love to see GRASS at OSGeo but those are softer points, and I'm obviously biased. :-) Best regards, -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED] light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, http://osgeo.org _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
