On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 05:58:09PM +1200, Hamish wrote: > I think both hosts would do a fine job, so no strong opinion as to > where the other end of the wire physically ends up. > > Very important to me though is that we get a ViewCVS 0.9.3 interface on > par with what we have now. There are a number of different flavours of > SCM-web interfaces around, but I've not met one as nice and usable as our > ViewCVS yet. (mostly I quite like ours and find all others I've tried to > be no where close) I depend on it heavily for diffs and exploring the > source tree + code history.
That's technically possible, see Martin's Test-SVN: http://josef.fsv.cvut.cz/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?root=grass7svn > (with the support of the server admin there is no reason we can't run > multiple SCM-web interfaces on the same repo if diff't folks have diff't > preferences as to a particular web interface) > > > I think it is a very good idea to keep the active web page and source > code repos in the same place. > > How to best archive the "grass" 5 repo without losing the change history? > If SCM moves away from intevation.de, we must expect that one day they > will want to turn the historical CVS server off. Sure - but this can always happen everywhere. We could focus on GRASS 7 repo now and spend more time later to do a full conversion of grass/ (GRASS 5) with all branches which is causing some problems right now. Markus ------------------ ITC -> dall'1 marzo 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler ITC -> since 1 March 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler ------------------ _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
