There do not seem to be any serious objections to the migration to
OSGeo SVN/Trac,
neither has anybody requested a vote, so I suggest that Markus starts
the migration
on Monday. It is becoming quite urgent due to the changes at ITC-irst
(now FBK)
so let us not delay further unless there is a very serious reason
thanks, Helena
Helena Mitasova
Dept. of Marine, Earth and Atm. Sciences
1125 Jordan Hall, NCSU Box 8208,
Raleigh NC 27695
http://skagit.meas.ncsu.edu/~helena/
On Oct 9, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Helena Mitasova wrote:
We just had a good discussion about the move of GRASS7 development
to SVN that quietly died out without any decision. I am guessing that
there are several of us who are waiting for the move to happen so that
we can get on with our work. So I would like to ask, please check
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/SVN_hosting
(especially explore the links to
GDAL SVN/Trac Server, OSGeo-SAC and Peer1)
speak-up if you have concerns and if there are no objections Markus
can start the transition of GRASS CVS to OSGeo SVN/Trac, so that we
can use the same infrastructure as GDAL, OSSIM and other OSGeo
projects. We can keep the current Mediawiki as user Wiki and use
Trac as development wiki + PSC.
Thanks a lot,
Helena
P.S. If anybody feels that this issue needs a PSC vote to make it
more formal,
please let Markus know and he can put it up for a vote.
Helena Mitasova
Dept. of Marine, Earth and Atm. Sciences
1125 Jordan Hall, NCSU Box 8208,
Raleigh NC 27695
http://skagit.meas.ncsu.edu/~helena/
On Sep 15, 2007, at 11:33 PM, Helena Mitasova wrote:
I agree with what was already said and I think that there are
obvious
advantages to have all OSGeo projects using the same infrastructure.
As others have mentioned - the reliability of Intevation has been
outstanding -
would the new site be equaly reliable?
I have added the info from Frank to the wiki, along with the link
(I hope I got it right) in case anybody wants to check it out:
http://www.peer1.net/en/colocation.asp
It looks as good as it could be, so the last question remains - who
is paying for the service and is there a possibility that the cost
may become
too high for OSGeo (and GRASS) community to handle?
Finally - do we need a vote on this for the record?
Helena
Helena Mitasova
Dept. of Marine, Earth and Atm. Sciences
1125 Jordan Hall, NCSU Box 8208,
Raleigh NC 27695
http://skagit.meas.ncsu.edu/~helena/
On Sep 14, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Markus Neteler wrote:
Dear PSC,
we should decide (or give a recommendation to the
developers team) about the migration from CVS to SVN.
This is currently holding the start of GRASS 7 development.
Essentially, all want to migrate to SVN for various
advantages already discussed. But we have to define
where the hosting will take place. Currently there
are two offers:
- SVN with GForge at Intevation in Germany
- SVN with Trac and Wiki at OSGeo.org
With help from Martin Landa I made a Wiki page to
confront both suggestions:
http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/SVN_hosting
I suggest to discuss this now, add further comments
on the Wiki page where appropriate, decide and
then really do it soon. There is no real reason
to wait any longer.
Please visit the Wiki page and come up with
comments. I cc to the grass-dev list to reach
all interested people.
Markus
PS: I'll let through relevant cross-postings which
will be kept by Mailman in case people aren't subscribed
to 'grass-psc'.
------------------
ITC -> dall'1 marzo 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler
ITC -> since 1 March 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler
------------------
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________
grass-psc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
