Moritz,
are you communicating with the debianGIS packaging team?
From reading the message below I was not sure what goes into the
package -
it looks like GRASS6.2 and maybe GRASS6.3?
It would be a pitty if it had only GRASS6.2 (does anybody on this
list even
remember how GRASS6.2 looks like?) because GRASS6.3 is so much better.
Is there any way that we can make sure that GRASS6.3 gets into the
package?
Also along the same line - would it be appropriate to encourage
people to
download GRASS6.3 maybe by adding the following to the header of
the downloads table:
GRASS6.2.3 (...), please try GRASS6.3 technology preview - it is
stable and much better
As it is presented now, getting GRASS6.3 is sort of discouraging
Helena
On May 8, 2008, at 1:49 PM, Moritz Lennert wrote:
I have finally found the time to create .deb packages of 6.3.0 for
Ubuntu Hardy Heron.
They are available at
http://geog-pc40.ulb.ac.be/grass/ubuntu/6.3.0/
Jachym, feel free to put them on your server if this is useful.
Moritz
------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Francesco P. Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DebianGIS] Freezing is not so far in the future, aka Where 1.0
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:45:19 +0200
Hi all
This message is a very informal and incomplete report about
our Status of the Map.
I would remind that package freezing is roughly expected in mid July.
People is warmly invited to think ASAP what upstream versions should
go into
Lenny. Two months are not a so long time in the future and please
consider that our packages have a not so large user base for testing.
Many packages also have a quite long dependencies chain which could
slow down britney job. So be very careful and defensive in uploading
new versions.
There will be the possibility of uploading GDAL 1.5.2 (probably),
hdf5 1.6.7 and
hdf4 4.2r1 for lenny. IMHO grass is already frozen (but for a probable
6.3.0 preview version to be uploaded in parallel with the stable
release). It would be nice to know if we have already to consider
frozen PostGis and Mapserver, but for some minor adjustment.
If people had to point patches for known upstream issues it would
be great.
A big lack is Qgis which requires more love of what I'm
able to dedicate. Some volunteers headed to manage it better
for a 0.10.0 release, but it's still missing. About that, consider
that the ftpmasters' job will be specifically accurate, so
a damn good job need to be done to solve its main issues.
I worked a bit on uDig and gvSig: they both at the same time require
too much work in order to have them properly packaged (they lacks a
proper multi-user installer for instance and there are also a few
license issue to be considered), and they are also easily
installable as they are by the casual user starting from the upstream
provided installers, so probably they should not be on the top
of our todo lists.
Saga Gis is easily buildable, but I had big problems in using it
also for working with quite easy shape and geotiff files.
It seems quite far from being a mature product. I would add
that among interesting experimental stuff, as already done with Ossim
which at least starts to have a shape. But still not ready for main.
I would hope other people would summarize status of OSM-related
packages.
Finally, we are still lacking human resources. Which is not a news
for this project, but I can see the same problems in other
teams, such as the Tcl/Tk group, sigh. We are in a bit better status
than one year ago anyway. I would prefer that some folks who
anyway do some packaging efforts out there in the GIS world would
collaborate here. But hey, we are in a free world and I know
that Debian standars are quite high and demanding ...
Happy gis-hacking to all
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On 25/04/08 20:54, Moritz Lennert wrote:
On 23/04/08 16:13, Carlos "Guâno" Grohmann wrote:
Eric,
to create the .deb files you can use checkinstall. In the end of the
compiling process, instead of "make install" you do a "checkinstall"
and create the deb file (or rpm, or other).
Yes, that is an intermediate solution, but I'd rather see
real .deb packages, i.e. with all the debian-related patches
included in terms of paths and other issues.
It shouldn't be too hard since everything exists in the DebianGIS
repository, it just takes a bit of time to do it...and I haven't
found the time, yet.
Moritz
cheers
Carlos
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Patton, Eric
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is involved in creating a package? I'll be updating to
Heron sometime within
the next week. All my proj/gdal/python stuff is up-to-date. Is
it just a matter of
creating 'make bindist', and placing the tarfile on an ftp site?
~ Eric.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jachym
Cepicky
Sent: Wed 4/23/2008 10:45 AM
To: Moritz Lennert
Cc: grass-dev
Subject: [GRASS-dev] Re: GRASS et al packages for Hardy Heron ?
HI Moritz,
Moritz Lennert píse v Út 22. 04. 2008 v 10:03 +0200:
Hello Jachym,
>
> I just learned last night that the computers I will use for a
training
> course on FOSS-GIS are running Hardy Heron and Gutsy Gibbon
as I was
> told before.
> Are you planning to update your packages to Hardy Heron in
> a very near future ?
Depends on the definition of "near". It will probably take me
another
month: I have tons of work now and I would like to try out amd64
version.
> Does someone else have packages of GRASS + QGIS +
> Dependencies for that platform ?
Afaik no :-(
>
> Moritz
Sorry,
Jachym
--
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail:jachym les-ejk cz
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://www.les-ejk.cz/pgp/jachym_cepicky-gpg.pub
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
