Martin Landa wrote: > is there any special reason why libgis is named in ctypes interface as > grass.py [1].
Compatibility with the old SWIG wrappers: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/swig/python/Makefile?rev=42931 Originally, the SWIG wrappers consisted of a single module named python_grass7. When it was split into multiple modules, the libgis wrapper was named "grass", although I don't think that there was any particular reason behind that. http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/35275/grass/trunk/swig/python/Makefile > I would vote for gis.py to keep consistency in names. If we're going to do it, it should be done sooner rather than later. -- Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
