Hi, 2011/3/8 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>: >> is there any special reason why libgis is named in ctypes interface as >> grass.py [1]. > > Compatibility with the old SWIG wrappers: > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/swig/python/Makefile?rev=42931 > > Originally, the SWIG wrappers consisted of a single module named > python_grass7. When it was split into multiple modules, the libgis > wrapper was named "grass", although I don't think that there was any > particular reason behind that.
Thanks for explanation. > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/changeset/35275/grass/trunk/swig/python/Makefile > >> I would vote for gis.py to keep consistency in names. > > If we're going to do it, it should be done sooner rather than later. I would vote for that. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev