On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote: > On 31/10/12 09:15, Markus Metz wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Yann Chemin<yann.che...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 31 October 2012 02:25, Helena Mitasova<hmit...@ncsu.edu> wrote: >>>> > >>>> Maybe PSC should have some mechanism to decide on which add-ons to move >>>> to >>>> trunk based on a defined set of criteria. >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 >> >> I suggest that modules should not simply be moved from addons to >> trunk, but that a developer has a close look at a module including >> testing before moving it to trunk. > > > +1, but I see Martin's point about lack of dev power. So the trade-off has > to be between quality of code and value added of having a functionality in > trunk even if the code is not perfect. > True, but still, a little effort could be made. I did not mean exhaustive testing of the functionality, rather basic stuff like code formatting, checking for and removing any justified compiler warnings, for raster modules checking NULL handling and CELL/FCELL/DCELL handling, for vector modules checking feature type, category, and layer handling.
Markus M _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev