On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com> wrote: > > Moritz Lennert wrote: > >> > I suggest that modules should not simply be moved from addons to >> > trunk, but that a developer has a close look at a module including >> > testing before moving it to trunk. >> >> +1, but I see Martin's point about lack of dev power. So the trade-off >> has to be between quality of code and value added of having a >> functionality in trunk even if the code is not perfect. > > Relegating something to add-ons is a reliable way to reduce the amount > of developer oversight it gets. E.g. currently you can't just "make" > the add-ons/grass7 directory (it lacks a Makefile),
Now there is. > so most developers > won't even try to compile it. If the modules were in trunk, developers > may notice errors or warnings as part of the normal build process. Agreed. I also think that we need the toolbox concept rather at GUI level than at directory level. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev