Moritz Lennert wrote: .. > I just did a quick test: > pan in: > mean: 31.813 > standard deviation: 3.75447 > > ms in: > mean: 15.2307 > standard deviation: 3.55858 > > pan out: > mean: 15.6117 > standard deviation: 3.23408
> So for this example, mean seems to have been adjusted, but stddev not. Thanks. Looks not to be the exact same here too. > > > > ? Would it be desired to get the HPFA algorithm integrated in > > > > i.pansharpen? > > > Yes. I think that if we have a generic module such as i.pansharpen, it > > > would be preferable to have all pansharpening methods in that one > > > module. > > There is one "difference" in that HPFA treats all bands to be sharpened > > separately. And, in this manner, it can be (mis-)used to sharpen any > > low-res band. For example, WorldView-2 products have 8 multi-spectral > > bands. Hence the "not red= green= blue=" design so far from my side. > i.pansharpen does not imply rgb either (although the description of the > ms* parameters does suggest that. You can obviously use any ms bands you > want. Yes, I know. I just wanted to avoid this r= g= b= logic. Maybe I am wrong and perhaps it is better, indeed, to follow the common path.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
