Hi, I read the document and support it,
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote: > > > Last doubts: > > * Step1: .... "The Project manager (or if exists the Release manager) > then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support > for this proposal. " > > --> this "sufficient" is still a bit elastic. If one developer is > against it, others in favour, it is fine to start? Leave it to > democratical debates? Just to be sure. > To me this makes sense, because it's a good thing that the release manager should have the chance to make a decision on a case by case basis. I'm more in favor of do-ocracy rather than democratical debate ;-) but it's just my opinion > > > Just a minor comment is that we shall probably clearly specify who is > > responsible for the mentioned actions: call for soft, hard freeze etc. > > That's the release manager. But I added that now (looks more dramatic > than it is, trac doesn't highlight well this time).: > > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=16&old_version=13 > > ... makes sense? > +1 Thank you Margherita > > -- Best regards, Dr. Margherita DI LEO Scientific / technical project officer European Commission - DG JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) Via Fermi, 2749 I-21027 Ispra (VA) - Italy - TP 261 Tel. +39 0332 78 3600 margherita.di-...@jrc.ec.europa.eu Disclaimer: The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstance be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
