On Jan 7, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Markus Neteler wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Massimiliano Cannata > <massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote: >> Dear all, I went trough the document and it make perfectly sense to me. > > I agree. I updated its date now and expanded "RC" in the beginning. > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure > > Last doubts: > > * Step1: .... "The Project manager (or if exists the Release manager) > then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support > for this proposal. " > > --> this "sufficient" is still a bit elastic. If one developer is > against it, others in favour, it is fine to start? Leave it to > democratical debates? Just to be sure.
I changed "to decide" to "and decides" so it is more clear that it is at the discretion of the Project/Release manager to decide whether there is sufficient support. If Project manager cannot decide by himself (e.g. he/she is not sure), he/she can always call for a vote by PSC. > >> Just a minor comment is that we shall probably clearly specify who is >> responsible for the mentioned actions: call for soft, hard freeze etc. > > That's the release manager. But I added that now (looks more dramatic > than it is, trac doesn't highlight well this time).: > > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=16&old_version=13 > > ... makes sense? I made small language edits which did not change the meaning of the document and I agree with the document. Helena > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > grass-...@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev