Martin Landa wrote > Hi, > > in the light of GRASS 7.0.0 release I would suggest to change current > OSGeo4W package naming convention from: > > (option a) > > * grass70 to grass7 (version 7.0.0) > * grass70-dev to grass7-dev (version 7.0.1svn) > * grass71-dev to grass-trunk-dev (7.1.svn) > > or > > (option b) > > * grass70 to grass (version 7.0.0) > * grass to grass6 (version 6.4.4) > * grass64-dev to grass6-dev (version 6.4.5svn) > * grass70-dev to grass-dev (version 7.0.1svn) > * grass71-dev to grass-trunk-dev (7.1.svn) > > It's hot topic, I would like to solve it during this weekend (before > announcing GRASS 7 officially). > > Personally I would vote for b). Any opinion? It's strategic decision, > so please feel free to give me feedback ASAP...
I tend to b), as we may retire the grass6x-lines with grass7.0.1. thus only grass, grass-dev and grass-trunk-dev will remain. ----- best regards Helmut -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/osgeo4w-package-for-GRASS-7-tp5189077p5189083.html Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev