Hi, 2015-02-21 21:49 GMT+01:00 Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org>: > We should follow somewhat the naming scheme in OSGeo4W. Here what QGIS does: > > http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/wiki/pkg-qgis > > Packages: > > qgis: QGIS Desktop > qgis-server: QGIS Server > qgis-common: common dependencies of qgis/qgis-server > qgis-devel: headers and libraries for development > qgis-oracle-provider: Oracle provider for qgis/qgis-server > qgis-grass-plugin: GRASS plugin for qgis > qgis-globe-plugin: GLOBE plugin for qgis > qgis-full: (extensive) optional dependencies for qgis > qgis-dev: Nightly build of master > qgis-full-dev: (extensive) optional dependencies for qgis-dev > qgis-dev-pdb: debugging symbols for qgis-dev
well, qgis is really an expection, I think they didn't chose a good naming scheme. Most of the OSGeo4W packages uses -dev postfix for package with development files (headers, ...). QGIS broke these schema since they named such packages as -devel and -dev used for daily package. I am not sure if we need to follow what QGIS broke. Martin -- Martin Landa http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa http://gismentors.cz/mentors/landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
