+1 On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote:
> > On Feb 25, 2016 5:05 PM, "Vaclav Petras" <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> this system is used also by QGIS, MapServer, moreover it's part of > >> GRASS history (with one exception - 6.3). I have no strong option > >> about that. I would say let's follow our tradition to use odd numbers > >> for dev versions. Martin > > > > > > > > The fact that other OSGeo projects are using it is quite convincing. But > anyway, I don't see a point in simply skipping a version number. > > Well, we are using 7.1 visibly for so long as unstable/dev version. > So it sounds perfectly fine to call the result 7.2. > > Markus > > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > -- Doug Newcomb USFWS Raleigh, NC 919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newc...@fws.gov --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the Interior. Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats. As a federal employee, my email may be subject to FOIA request.
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
