On 26 February 2016 15:58:00 CET, Vaclav Petras <wenzesl...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Paulo van Breugel ><p.vanbreu...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> >> For the individual modules / functions, the graphics used in the >GRASS >> Tools in QGIS may be an option. I don't think there are graphics for >all >> functions yet, but for many there are (not saying they are all better >than >> the ones used now in the graphical index, but some might) >> > > >More than with images for each module I'm concerned with the overall >page >design, specifically the header. The name of module should be more >prominent, there should be "GRASS GIS" somewhere and also the version >(and >it should be (close to) HTML5-valid which is good for search engines).
One other welcome improvement would be to make the manual pages more mobile friendly (also good for search engines) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev