I have updated the manual of i.superpixels.slic in r70724, explaining why the GRASS implementation does not provide results identical to the original implementation. Please review!
Markus M On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Moritz Lennert <[email protected] > wrote: > On 02/03/17 12:09, Sophie Crommelinck wrote: > >> Hi Moritz, >> >> thank you for your extensive answer! Your reply was very clear and >> solved most of my questions, I added two comments in your mail below. >> >> @ Vaclav Petras: You asked to provide the data as well. I uploaded the >> part of the orthoimage shown in the screenshots to the same folder: >> https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW >> <https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW> >> > > After import I get ortho.red, ortho.green, ortho.blue. > > Using > > i.group ortho.red in=ortho.red > i.superpixels.slic ortho.red out=red_sup iterations=50 step=15 perturb=50 > compactness=3 memory=5000 > > I get the following result in 1m40s: > > http://tomahawk.ulb.ac.be/moritz/superpixels_ortho_red.png > > Not so bad, I would say ;-) > > > Moritz > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
