Hello, @ Moritz: Thanks for the support, I will continue testing the module with further data. @ Markus: I think the manual is clearer now.
Best, Sophie 2017-03-03 21:27 GMT+01:00 Markus Metz <[email protected]>: > I have updated the manual of i.superpixels.slic in r70724, explaining why > the GRASS implementation does not provide results identical to the original > implementation. Please review! > > Markus M > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Moritz Lennert < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 02/03/17 12:09, Sophie Crommelinck wrote: >> >>> Hi Moritz, >>> >>> thank you for your extensive answer! Your reply was very clear and >>> solved most of my questions, I added two comments in your mail below. >>> >>> @ Vaclav Petras: You asked to provide the data as well. I uploaded the >>> part of the orthoimage shown in the screenshots to the same folder: >>> https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW >>> <https://share4land.itc.utwente.nl:5566/sharing/fS3tbiWuW> >>> >> >> After import I get ortho.red, ortho.green, ortho.blue. >> >> Using >> >> i.group ortho.red in=ortho.red >> i.superpixels.slic ortho.red out=red_sup iterations=50 step=15 perturb=50 >> compactness=3 memory=5000 >> >> I get the following result in 1m40s: >> >> http://tomahawk.ulb.ac.be/moritz/superpixels_ortho_red.png >> >> Not so bad, I would say ;-) >> >> >> Moritz >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
