On 25 July 2017 at 15:30, Vincent Bain <b...@toraval.fr> wrote: > Hello Luca and Vaclav,
Hi Vincent, > thank you for forwarding me this thread. > sorry if I didn't add you before.. > [I'm not sure how pertinent is my comment on this, given I don't know > much of the OSGeo context where this flyer is meant to be published -- > soory if I misunderstand] > > I would just recommend (just my 2 c., not any kind of claim) to take > into account the effort we made some time ago to enhance the graphical > identity of GRASS, esp. concerning fonts, colors, usage of GRASS GIS > logo. It is probably not that easy to clearly distinguish between OSGeo > and GRASS identity clues (all is more or less green and black and > white...), but I suggest that: > * we keep using the original GRASS "green" definition on this paper, I > mean for the logo only (not titles, I understand they belong to OSGeo > guidelines), or alternatively decline the logo in greyscale; +1 instead I will leave our official logo > * GRASS GIS wording (and possibly the slogan) be consistent with our > identity (esp. font). > eh this is a problem... you need to think that this is the OSGeo brochure for GRASS and the idea is to have a consistent fonts/color of OSGeo. We will continue to use our flyer that it is really cool. Maybe use could distinguish between this flyer and our: - this should be more generic for an ample public - our a little more technical what do you think about this? > Besides this, as you said, a horizontal version of the logo is probably > lacking. We could recycle the startup banner layout ? > +1 > > Yours, > Vincent. > thanks -- ciao Luca www.lucadelu.org _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev