On 26 July 2017 at 11:31, Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote:
>
> Some quick remarks:
>
> - First of all: who are why addressing with this ? Users or developers ? The
> following remarks assume users.
>

new users

> - The first title reads "A mature mapping suite". I'm not sure I would
> advertise GRASS first and foremost for mapping. I'd rather present it as
> "A mature spatial analysis suite" or something similar.
>

+1, you are completely right

> - Maybe an extract of the "GRASS GIS capabilities" on
> https://grass.osgeo.org/documentation/general-overview/ would be more
> important than the interoperability and development information. I think
> people should first get a vision of what GRASS GIS actually does before
> thinking about how interoperable it is...
>
> - Paragraphs could possibly be rearranged to create a drilling down from the
> most important general info to more specific info. I would say that for
> first contact with users the most important elements are: what is it/what
> does it do ? who uses it ? On what OS's does it run ? Is there documentation
> ? Is there a community ? Is it "certified" (I agree that the fact that it is
> an OSGeo project needs to be prominently present) ?  ...
>

I follow this two idea and revisit the flyer, please look the new version

https://github.com/lucadelu/osgeo/blob/grass/marketing/print/grass_a4.svg

>
> That's all for now, especially since I will not have time to work on this in
> the near future... ;-)
>
> Moritz
>
>



-- 
ciao
Luca

www.lucadelu.org
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to