On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> wrote: ... > I agree that we do not have to guarantee that the development version is > translated. IMHO, priority for translation should go to the stable,
+1 > or soon-to-be version which would mean that as soon as we create a release > branch, translations should be maintained for this release branch as long as > it is supported, +1 > but any old release branch should be in strict bug-fix only > mode as soon as a new release is out, so message strings should not change > much. > > Does that sound feasible ? This is what I also think. Yet the workflow isn't fully implemented yet. And Maris will appreciate to not lose his translations (how to do that?)... Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
