On 2/25/22 08:33, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 7:24 AM Sebastiaan Couwenberg
<sebas...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
On 2/24/22 15:23, Vaclav Petras wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2022 at 03:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
Should we perhaps take this opportunity to move the grass libraries to
default library search paths as raised on the debian-gis list?
https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2021/12/msg00023.html
I vote yes. I think the reasons to do this are no longer valid. Doing it
the standard way seems to me to be the best way forward. Any
suggestions/PRs?
Not using --prefix=/usr/lib will violate FHS, so not an option for the
Debian package.
Are users of libgdal-grass expected to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like the
grass executable does to find the grass libraries?
In
https://grasswiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Compile_and_install_GDAL-GRASS_plugin#Compilation_and_Installation_of_the_GDAL-GRASS_plugin
the creation of a LD_LIBRARY_PATH file is suggested:
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/grass.conf
That violates the Debian policy, and triggers a lintian error:
"
It is not okay to install libraries in a different directory and then
modify the run-time link path. Shared libraries should go into
/usr/lib. Alternatively, they can require binaries to set the RPATH to
find the library.
"
https://lintian.debian.org/tags/package-modifies-ld.so-search-path
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
