I think this is a splendid idea! Would be good to keep the label as short as possible, perhaps: - "backport 8.0" - "backport 8.2” ?
At any rate, I have no strong opinion regarding the form, I fully support the general idea. Best, Nicklas > On 22 Nov 2022, at 12:00, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote: > > Hi devs, > > Our generic "backport" label seems to be mildly confusing (backport to > which branch?). > > My suggestion is to adopt the approach of GDAL: > > - backport release 7.8 > - backport release 8.2 > ... > > Like this also multiple labels could be set. > > Opinions? > > cheers, > Markus > > -- > Markus Neteler, PhD > https://www.mundialis.de - free data with free software > https://grass.osgeo.org > https://courses.neteler.org/blog > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
