For the backport bot
(https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/master/.github/workflows/backport.yml)
to work, I believe the label must be exactly "backport {git_branch_name}"
Le 22/11/2022 à 18:47, Nicklas Larsson via grass-dev a écrit :
I think this is a splendid idea!
Would be good to keep the label as short as possible, perhaps:
- "backport 8.0"
- "backport 8.2”
?
At any rate, I have no strong opinion regarding the form, I fully support the
general idea.
Best, Nicklas
On 22 Nov 2022, at 12:00, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote:
Hi devs,
Our generic "backport" label seems to be mildly confusing (backport to
which branch?).
My suggestion is to adopt the approach of GDAL:
- backport release 7.8
- backport release 8.2
...
Like this also multiple labels could be set.
Opinions?
cheers,
Markus
--
Markus Neteler, PhD
https://www.mundialis.de - free data with free software
https://grass.osgeo.org
https://courses.neteler.org/blog
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
