2014-04-06 15:16 GMT+02:00 Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be>:
> Hamish, maybe you could be the official grass6 maintainer, managing the > whole grass6 development in the way you propose, i.e. any new development > and bugfixes first go into grass6dev for a period of testing, before _you_ > make the decision that something can be backported to grass6release. I do > think however, that for this to work, we would need to regularly publish > snapshots of grass6dev for easy testing. I think we should really stop thinking about GRASS 6 "development", ideally we should fully focus our energy on GRASS 7. We do not have enough man-power for keeping development in GRASS 6, simply saying. So please bug fix only should go there (relbr64). No new functionality. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/gwiki/Landa _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc