On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:26 AM, Massimiliano Cannata <massimiliano.cann...@supsi.ch> wrote: > Dear all, I went trough the document and it make perfectly sense to me.
I agree. I updated its date now and expanded "RC" in the beginning. http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure Last doubts: * Step1: .... "The Project manager (or if exists the Release manager) then collects reactions to decide whether there is sufficient support for this proposal. " --> this "sufficient" is still a bit elastic. If one developer is against it, others in favour, it is fine to start? Leave it to democratical debates? Just to be sure. > Just a minor comment is that we shall probably clearly specify who is > responsible for the mentioned actions: call for soft, hard freeze etc. That's the release manager. But I added that now (looks more dramatic than it is, trac doesn't highlight well this time).: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/wiki/RFC/4_ReleaseProcedure?action=diff&version=16&old_version=13 ... makes sense? Markus _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc