Hi everyone, El dom, 13 dic 2020 a las 21:19, Moritz Lennert (< mlenn...@club.worldonline.be>) escribió:
> > Am 13. Dezember 2020 20:36:05 MEZ schrieb Markus Neteler < > nete...@osgeo.org>: > >On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:38 PM Hernán De Angelis > ><variablestarli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi again, > >> > >> In the wiki, eligible voters are defined as those with svn access. This > is perhaps outdated? > > > >Yes, that's definitely outdated. > > > >> In 2020 it should perhaps be those who can merge a pull request in > GitHub? Or should we choose another definition? > > Only merge rights (i.e. write access to the grass repository) seems very > restrictive in current github PR times. > Fully agreed! Last time, all of us in the contributors and contributors_extra files were given voting rights. We could also consider those in translators.csv. I don't remember if they were considered last time. I believe they were not. > >I believe that we should also recognize other contributions > >(documentation, translation etc). > > How to define this, though. In my eyes we should be as inclusive as > reasonable. > > Maybe we could say: > > - All people with write access to any of the GRASS GIS repositories (i.e > for example also including add-ons and website). > - All people that have already posted a pull request to github (possibly > only those PR that have been merged) > - All people that have contributed to Transifex. > +1! I've been searching in Transifex, and found this: https://www.transifex.com/grass-gis/teams/. But, I'm not sure which number really represents those that have actually translated strings and most importantly how to easily get such a list. What about those Google Code-In students that have contributed with screenshots and examples to manual pages, as well as those contributing tests? cheers, Vero
_______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc