Thanks, the reasons of the choice are clear. I obviously were not asking to switch to pyQT! I know it would a completely new work. I was just considering how to take advantage from the fact that Python is common to Grass and QGis...
Giovanni 2008/1/25, Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, > > 2008/1/25, G. Allegri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I would have asked the same question as Luca. Wouldn't it be more > profitable > > using QT, as it is already the way Python script are written in QGis? I > know > > yes, that's true, it would be profitable at the end. > > > the two projects are independent, but having a common GUI language could > > improve the development of scripts in both the environments and the > > portability of them. > > My impression is that wxWindow is a bit easier to manage then QT, but > since > > many of us write scripts for QGis too, it would be better to learn well > one > > system (QT) then two (QT and wxWindow) :-) > > After discussion (one/two years ago) we found wxWidgets as the best > option for our needs. Since we have limited resources I don't see > switching from wxPython to something else as a realistic option. > Currenly wxPython GUI is under active development, the future shows... > > Regards, Martin > > -- > Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
