Hi, 2008/1/25, G. Allegri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would have asked the same question as Luca. Wouldn't it be more profitable > using QT, as it is already the way Python script are written in QGis? I know
yes, that's true, it would be profitable at the end. > the two projects are independent, but having a common GUI language could > improve the development of scripts in both the environments and the > portability of them. > My impression is that wxWindow is a bit easier to manage then QT, but since > many of us write scripts for QGis too, it would be better to learn well one > system (QT) then two (QT and wxWindow) :-) After discussion (one/two years ago) we found wxWidgets as the best option for our needs. Since we have limited resources I don't see switching from wxPython to something else as a realistic option. Currenly wxPython GUI is under active development, the future shows... Regards, Martin -- Martin Landa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa * _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
