Richard Chirgwin wrote: > oops. I meant "dependency management", not a Grass critique, a more > general issue for Linux users ...
I take it you've never tried Debian then ;) really the packaging is only as good as the spec/control file info, the same applies to the cygwin packages etc. Debian is so "good" at this not because the technology is behind the package management there is so good*, it is because the packaging rules are rather explicit, strict, and enforced. [*] it may be, but that's besides the point I do not know if the SuSE packages are build using the spec from the GRASS source code, but you could check the rpm/ source code dir and submit any fixes you have. http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/trunk/rpm Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
