Glynn Clements wrote: > > Okay, I did find verification that this doesn't work in r.resamp.stats: > > > > *[1] The min and max aggregates can't use weights, so -w has no effect for > > those.* > > Hmm. There's no fundamental reason why I can't add "weighted" versions > of the min/max aggregates. Obviously, these would ignore the weights, > but it would allow r.resamp.stats to include the source cell in the > calculation for each destination cell which overlaps it.
Implemented in r33888 (in 7.0). The aforementioned comment in the Wiki still stands. min/max aren't actually weighted, so the behaviour of those aggregates with a perfectly aligned grid is "unstable" (i.e. the exact result may depend upon miniscule rounding errors) even when -w is used. -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user