I think 7 is fine. My current approach is working well enough. Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Glynn Clements > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Glynn Clements wrote: > ... > > Implemented in r33888 (in 7.0). > > > > The aforementioned comment in the Wiki still stands. min/max aren't > > actually weighted, so the behaviour of those aggregates with a > > perfectly aligned grid is "unstable" (i.e. the exact result may depend > > upon miniscule rounding errors) even when -w is used. > > Jamie, > > do you want need this in 6.4 (hence, backport)? Or are you fine > with GRASS 7? According to Glynn it's a slightly incompatible > change which isn't 100% in line with our backport policy. > > Markus >
_______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
