On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:06 PM, <antonio.ro...@deimos.com.pt> wrote: > Greetings > > > > Daniel lee suggested me that the problem might be the defined region. But, > as far as I know, Defined region has no impact over importing data. This is > true right?
Yes, r.in.gdal ignores the current region. The extents and resolution as reported by gdalinfo for the original raster and r.info for the imported raster must be identical. Markus M > > Thanks > > Antonio > > > > Am 27. März 2012 11:52 schrieb António Rocha <antonio.ro...@deimos.com.pt>: > > >> Greetings >> I have imported a Raster image in GRASS 6.4.1 with r.in.gdal and now, when >> I import the same raster (with 6.4.2) there is a grid mistmatch (more or >> less a quarter pixel) from previous import to the current import. The image >> is the same, the Location/Mapset also the only difference is the update of >> GRASS. Is this expected? >> Thanks >> Antonio > > > _______________________________________________ > grass-user mailing list > grass-user@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user > _______________________________________________ grass-user mailing list grass-user@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user